About

This is the default template for Pivot. You can change this text by editing the file frontpage_template.html in your pivot/templates/ folder. You can do this by directly editing the file, or you can go to Administration » Templates in the Pivot interface.

The image in the header is © Andreas Reinhold.

Archives

01 Feb - 28 Feb 2009
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2009
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2010

Links

Search!

Last Comments

Wilber Stone (Outsourcing- mana…): Beauty is while in the ey…

Stuff

Powered by Pivot - 1.40.3: 'Dreadwind' 
XML: RSS Feed 
XML: Atom Feed 

« How good is your cons… | Home |

Outsourcing- managing expectation

14 08 09 - 00:00 Why do 'outsourcing' get negative results, why companies still continue to do outsourcing? strangely in some cases the failed project was executed in the overseas office of the same company! In theory every relationship is based on expectation and it is not very different for the business relationship established between a service provider and the customer. The success of your project is based on how accurate these expectations are established,... IT consulting and outsourcing is one of my favorite subjects. I talk to most of my friends in Software and other businesses about their experiences in outsourcing and moving projects completely or in part to different geographical locations. About 98% of time people get emotional and talk about their negative experiences. Why do they get negative results, why they still continue to do outsourcing? I have seen failed projects, strangely in some cases the failed project was executed in the overseas office of the same company!

In theory every relationship is based on expectation and it is not very different for the business relationship established between a service provider and the customer. In this context between a project owner (company or department that outsources its project) and project executioner (a IT consulting firm). The success of your project is based on how accurate these expectations are established, how they are monitored, and how well the monitoring mechanism ties back to your original goals. There are certain forces of nature that operate against establishing and continuing such a relationship.
1. Sales team: As a project owner the first interaction you do with a potential project executioner is with their sales team. As part of differentiating them from rest of the competition these sales people have incentives to keep your expectation very high about their project execution team. With high expectation you go into project, after a while the reality check happens and you get a free fall from 20Th story of your office building. On the other side the execution team gets fed up with you and think you are very unrealistic on your demands. Whatever they do to help you is backfiring and you are classified internally as a 'problem customer'. Team members are unlikely to do any extra effort to make things better for you and you would see consultants leaving your project at very high rate. So in the initial phase of identifying suitable partner, gather all the data available and match it with your constraints and project goal to set your expectation. Make sure the team that is going to execute your project (not the sales people) understands it the same way you understands it.
2. Internal employees: There are certain employees who view outsourcing as a threat to their employment and object based on fear and prejudices. Only a very few employees change their attitude even after the project sees some progress. You can try to buy-in your employees by sharing data and constantly communicating with them, however avoid giving key responsibilities to these employees in overseeing the remote project. If you do have to involve them get your communication channels clear so that you get un-amplified and non-filtered data from the project execution team. There are another type of employees who try to make use of the situation for their personal growth at the expense of your team goals. This is when they report issues in the project and people many folds magnified than they actually are. Their goal is to make sure management understands how bad the execution team is doing, but how skilled, effective and committed they are in managing all issues and making the progress. Align structure, process and people in line with the changed environment. Assign the new roles to committed people who enjoy doing them and have stake in the team goal.
3. Time differences: This is one of the major factors. When you have a project outsourced to a place where the time zone is different, some stake holders in your company are going to spend time off hours on the project. The management has to understand the sacrifice they are making in doing so, and the participant has to schedule his/her time wisely. You spend long hours of work at office and participate in brain draining discussion with project execution team in the odd . This is dump and not sustainable. You are killing yourself and putting project into greater risks. When a project is outsourced, that doesn't mean project management and your team's involvement is no more there. It means you have different role and there may be slight shift in the daily schedule to perform those tasks. Count that in to your work life, not family life. It is difficult to practice, but not impossible.
4. Cultural differences: Even though people talk lengthy about cultural differences in a dynamic environment, I think people seldom understand the true impact of multi-culture working environment especially when part of the team is not physically in the same office. The impact is multi-dimensional- schedule & holidays, body languages & gestures, language and above all prejudices. You have to give respect to gain respect. When you mock at the other culture remember somebody at the other end is doing the same. Above all when you talk remember that the listener is as smart as you or better than you. Communicate honestly in plane and simple terms. Align your office culture and that of remote team.
Success or failure of a project does not entirely depend on these four forces, but they are extremely important in any projects. I can talk non-stop about other reasons that affects the end result of a remote executed project, however I think they are less important. I would be more than happy to hear from you on your experiences with a remote team. Remember, memory of bad experiences lasts longer than that of good experiences. As long as the executives see business reasons in conducting projects in other regions, remote execution is going to happen in whatever name you may call that process. In the long run, non-availability of domain experts could be another reason to move projects out of your office.
one comment

Beauty is while in the eye of the beholder, and all that. From your pictures I feel the 458 Italia has distinct echoes in the Dino. And that’s just fine with me! Performance, as described, sounds wonderful. Sorry I’m not realistically inside the marketplace for this new Ferrari, but the reality that such a auto might be created, developed, built, and sold (albeit in modest numbers) is trigger for fantastic celebration in this drab, depressing world.
Wilber Stone (Email) (URL) - 02 09 10 - 20:14


Trackback link:

Please enable javascript to generate a trackback url

  
Remember personal info?

Emoticons / Textile

To prevent automated commentspam we require you to answer this silly question
 

  (Register your username / Log in)

Notify:
Hide email:

Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.

 

Linkdump

» Outsourcing- managing expectation Why do 'outsourcing' get negative results, why companies still continue to do outsourcing? strangely in some cases the failed project was executed in the overseas office of the same company! In theory every relationship is based on expectation and it is not very different for the business relationship established between a service provider and the customer. The success of your project is based on how accurate these expectations are established,... (more)   one comment |
» How good is your consultant “Outsourcing” to India or China is a very lucrative term for finance departments, executives, venture capitalists and Wallstreet especially in the context of tech companies. But there are myriad of problems to deal with in making an outsourced project a success, and many of you who have worked at least with one such project can give a long list of such problems. Companies are now trying to find a successful formula to make such projects a success and those companies which succeeded in such projects are trying hard to repeat their success. (more)   No comments |